Zain, Muhammad Ibrahim. “Induction in the Thought of al-Shāṭibī and the Methodology of Reviewing Uṣūlī Writings,” Year 8, Issue 30 (Fall 1423 AH/ 2002 CE), Pp. 27-60.
PDF (العربية)

Keywords

الشاطبي - الغزالي - الاستقراء - أصول الفقه - التواتر - المقاصد - ابن عاشور.

How to Cite

زين إبراهيم محمد. “Zain, Muhammad Ibrahim. ‘Induction in the Thought of Al-Shāṭibī and the Methodology of Reviewing Uṣūlī Writings,’ Year 8, Issue 30 (Fall 1423 AH 2002 CE), Pp. 27-60”. Al-Fikr al-islāmī al-muʿāṣir (previously Islamiyat al-Ma’rifah) 8, no. 30 (October 1, 2002): 59–27. Accessed November 24, 2024. https://citj.org/index.php/citj/article/view/1519.

Abstract

Muhammad Ibrahim Zain’s article is comprised of three main parts. Part I compares the induction methodologies of al-Ghazālī and al-Shāṭibī. Part II explains the relationship between knowledge, action, and al-Shāṭibī’s intellectual project. Part III concerns the rebuilding  of the induction methodology on scientific foundations as is in the thought of al-Shāṭibī and Ibn ʿĀshūr. It concludes by emphasizing that the three scholars were enlightened figures in the understanding of methodological developments in the science of uṣūl al-fiqh (principles of jurisprudence), and that the linkage between induction and tawātur established the method of ascertaining the maqāṣid, and the possibility of developing a new Islamic science that resolves problematic issues in uṣūl al-fiqh.

https://doi.org/10.35632/citj.v8i30.1519
PDF (العربية)
Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2002 المعهد العالمي للفكر الإسلامي